<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[FastAF]]></title><description><![CDATA[FastAF]]></description><link>https://fastafco.hashnode.dev</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 11:14:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fastafco.hashnode.dev/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[SerpApi vs Exa vs Tavily vs Firecrawl for AI agents: price per call compared]]></title><description><![CDATA[If you are building an AI agent that needs fresh information from the web, you will quickly run into the same four names: SerpApi, Exa, Tavily and…]]></description><link>https://fastafco.hashnode.dev/serpapi-vs-exa-vs-tavily-vs-firecrawl-for-ai-agents-price-per-call-compared</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://fastafco.hashnode.dev/serpapi-vs-exa-vs-tavily-vs-firecrawl-for-ai-agents-price-per-call-compared</guid><category><![CDATA[api]]></category><category><![CDATA[AI]]></category><category><![CDATA[webscraping ]]></category><category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category><dc:creator><![CDATA[FastAF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 22:24:32 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are building an AI agent that needs fresh information from the web, you will quickly run into the same four names: SerpApi, Exa, Tavily and Firecrawl. They are often listed side by side, but they do quite different things, and their pricing models are hard to compare at a glance: monthly searches, credits that reset, credits per page, per-run pricing.</p>
<p>This article puts them next to each other on the questions that matter for agents: what each one actually returns, what a single call costs, whether you need a subscription, whether an agent can pay by itself, and whether there is an MCP server. All competitor prices were read from each vendor's official pricing pages and docs on 2026-10-25; they change, so check the linked sources before deciding. Disclosure: this comparison is published by FastAF, which is included at the end as a fifth option.</p>
<h2>What each one is for</h2>
<p>These tools are not interchangeable, and the cheapest one is irrelevant if it returns the wrong kind of data.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>SerpApi</strong> returns parsed search engine results pages as JSON. Its strength is breadth: besides Google it covers engines such as Google Flights, Hotels and Patents, Bing, Baidu, Yandex and the Apple App Store.</li>
<li><strong>Exa</strong> runs its own web, people, company and scholarly indexes and is built for semantic, "find similar" and research-style search, plus page contents for LLM context. It does not return the live Google SERP.</li>
<li><strong>Tavily</strong> is a search API aimed at RAG, with search, extract, crawl, map and research in one vendor.</li>
<li><strong>Firecrawl</strong> turns websites into LLM-ready markdown: scraping single pages, but especially crawling and mapping whole sites, interacting with pages and monitoring changes.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Price per call</h2>
<p>The table normalises each vendor's published pricing to the cost of one basic search call. Where a vendor sells plans rather than per-call prices, the per-call figure is simply the plan price divided by the included quota, which assumes you use the whole quota.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Provider</th>
<th>Published pricing (2026-10-25)</th>
<th>Basic search, per call</th>
<th>Source</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody><tr>
<td>SerpApi</td>
<td>Free 250 searches/month; Starter $25/month for 1,000; Developer $75/month for 5,000</td>
<td>$0.025 (Starter), $0.015 (Developer)</td>
<td><a href="https://serpapi.com/pricing">serpapi.com/pricing</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Exa</td>
<td>Search from $4/1k (Lite), $7/1k (Auto), $12/1k (Deep); Contents $1/1k pages</td>
<td>$0.004 (Lite), $0.007 (Auto)</td>
<td><a href="https://exa.ai/pricing">exa.ai/pricing</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tavily</td>
<td>Free 1,000 credits/month; PAYG $0.008/credit; basic search 1 credit, advanced 2</td>
<td>$0.008 (basic, PAYG)</td>
<td><a href="https://docs.tavily.com/documentation/api-credits">docs.tavily.com</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Firecrawl</td>
<td>Free 1,000 credits/month; Hobby $19/month for 5,000 credits â€¦ Scale $749/month for 1,000,000; Search 2 credits per 10 results, Scrape 1 credit/page</td>
<td>about $0.0076 per search on Hobby</td>
<td><a href="https://www.firecrawl.dev/pricing">firecrawl.dev/pricing</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FastAF</td>
<td>One-time packs $10â€“$799, credits valid 12 months; Google search 5 credits; x402 $0.001/credit</td>
<td>$0.0025â€“$0.00133 (packs), $0.005 (x402)</td>
<td><a href="https://fastaf.co/llms.txt">fastaf.co/llms.txt</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p>Two caveats. First, these calls do not return the same thing: an Exa Lite search over Exa's index is not equivalent to a live Google results page from SerpApi, and a Firecrawl search is not a Firecrawl crawl. Second, plan-based figures get cheaper on larger tiers (Firecrawl's Standard plan, for instance, is $99/month for 100,000 credits) and more expensive if you leave quota unused.</p>
<h2>Subscriptions, payments and MCP</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>SerpApi</th>
<th>Exa</th>
<th>Tavily</th>
<th>Firecrawl</th>
<th>FastAF</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody><tr>
<td>Model</td>
<td>Monthly plans</td>
<td>Pay-as-you-go</td>
<td>Monthly plans or PAYG</td>
<td>Monthly plans, optional $5 top-ups</td>
<td>One-time credits, nothing renews</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Free allowance</td>
<td>250 searches/month</td>
<td>$10 credits/month + $10 bonus</td>
<td>1,000 credits/month, keyless trial</td>
<td>1,000 credits/month, keyless tier for agents</td>
<td>2 calls after email verification</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>x402 (agent pays in USDC)</td>
<td>Not found</td>
<td>Search and Contents</td>
<td>Advanced search only, $0.01/call</td>
<td>Not found</td>
<td>All 16 endpoints</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MCP server</td>
<td>Yes, hosted</td>
<td>Yes, hosted</td>
<td>Yes (tavily-mcp)</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Yes, hosted, 16 tools</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p>"Not found" means we found no mention on the vendor's pricing page or docs on 2026-10-25, not that it definitely does not exist.</p>
<h2>Honest pros and cons</h2>
<p><strong>SerpApi.</strong> Pros: the widest engine catalogue of the group, a hosted MCP server, a free tier of 250 searches per month and a U.S. Legal Shield add-on listed on its pricing page. Cons: monthly plans make it the most expensive per search at low tiers, and we found no pay-per-call or x402 option, so an agent needs an account and a key.</p>
<p><strong>Exa.</strong> Pros: semantic search over its own indexes, cheap page contents at $1 per 1,000 pages, deep research runs, a monthly free credit, x402 on Search and Contents across several networks, and enterprise features such as SOC 2 Type II listed on its pricing page. Cons: it is not a Google SERP API, so it is the wrong tool if you need exactly what Google shows, Maps listings or Shopping results.</p>
<p><strong>Tavily.</strong> Pros: a coherent RAG toolset (search, extract, crawl, research), 1,000 free credits per month and keyless, rate-limited testing. Cons: monthly credits reset on the 1st, and x402 covers only advanced search at $0.01 per call.</p>
<p><strong>Firecrawl.</strong> Pros: the strongest option here for crawling and mapping entire sites into markdown, browser interaction and monitoring; keyless access for agents. Cons: plans are monthly; per its pricing page, 403 and 404 pages still cost a credit; and we found no x402 support.</p>
<p><strong>FastAF.</strong> Pros: live Google verticals (SERP, Maps, News, Shopping, Scholar, Jobs, AI answers) plus source-specific JSON for Amazon, Walmart, eBay, Zillow, YouTube transcripts and public LinkedIn/X profiles from one balance; no subscription; failed, blocked or empty responses are never charged; x402 on every endpoint. Cons: no whole-site crawl (one URL per call), a far smaller engine catalogue than SerpApi, no semantic index like Exa, a free tier of only 2 calls, and MCP tool calls require a key rather than x402.</p>
<h2>Which one to pick</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>You need many search engines or verticals beyond Google:</strong> SerpApi.</li>
<li><strong>You need semantic or research-style search for LLM context:</strong> Exa.</li>
<li><strong>You want a single RAG-oriented search and extract stack with a monthly free tier:</strong> Tavily.</li>
<li><strong>You need to crawl, map or monitor whole websites:</strong> Firecrawl.</li>
<li><strong>You need live Google results and structured data from specific sites, with irregular volume or an agent that pays per call:</strong> FastAF.</li>
</ul>
<p>Many agents combine two of these, for example semantic search for discovery plus a SERP or scraping API for live, structured data.</p>
<h2>Detailed comparisons</h2>
<p>Each pairing has a dedicated page with sources and FAQs:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://fastaf.co/compare/serpapi/">FastAF vs SerpApi</a></li>
<li><a href="https://fastaf.co/compare/exa/">FastAF vs Exa</a></li>
<li><a href="https://fastaf.co/compare/tavily/">FastAF vs Tavily</a></li>
<li><a href="https://fastaf.co/compare/firecrawl/">FastAF vs Firecrawl</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Prices were read on 2026-10-25 from serpapi.com/pricing, exa.ai/pricing, docs.tavily.com and firecrawl.dev/pricing, and fastaf.co/llms.txt. If you spot a figure that has changed, the vendor's page is the source of truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>